Executive buy-in kit — get your training proposal approved
Four questions that stall approval
Proposals are usually sent back not because of the training content, but because one of these four questions goes unanswered. Each of the three documents in the kit answers them.
- Why now
Approvers will first ask, 'Can’t this wait until next year?' Open the draft with the reason to act now — the schedule, organizational changes, or what is already happening — so they keep reading.
- Why this budget
Approval usually stalls on unclear scope, not on the amount. Itemize the instructor fee and the separate costs, and add one line explaining your basis for comparison.
- How do we measure the impact?
A '4.5 satisfaction score' is not a result an approver cares about. Deciding in the draft what you will measure before training and again afterward makes the results report easy to write.
- Why bring in an outside provider
This question asks why you should pay for something you could do in-house. Answer it by showing whether anyone in-house can teach the topic and what that person’s time costs.
How we calculate ROI
Keep assumptions conservative and write a one-line basis for each number. Approvers look at the assumptions, not the formula — a deliberately low value like '50% adoption rate' actually gets approved faster. The numbers in the example are assumptions to show how the calculation works; replace them with your company’s HR and finance baseline values.
| Training cost C | Instructor fee (excl. VAT) + separate items such as materials and travel | Copied directly from the quote calculator |
|---|---|---|
| ROI | (Benefit B − Training cost C) ÷ Training cost C × 100 | Above 0% means the training cost is recovered within one year |
| Payback period | Training cost C ÷ (Benefit B ÷ 12) | How many months until the training pays for itself? |
🤖 AI Training for Employees — Proposal · ROI · Likely Questions
① One-page approval request
| 1. Purpose | To bring all employees to the same level in using generative AI at work within company standards, reducing time spent on repetitive document work and managing the risk of information leaks. |
|---|---|
| 2. Background |
|
| 3. Training overview | Audience[ ] department(s), [ ] people (prioritize departments with heavy repetitive paperwork)Hours and format[4] hours of hands-on, on-site training (each participant brings a laptop)Preferred schedule[ ] month, week [ ], afternoon half-dayProviderNanum Consulting (nanumcon.com) — industry-specific practice assignments providedKey contentProhibited inputs and company rules → hands-on practice by task (reports, meeting minutes, email) → each participant completes one real work task with AI and submits the result |
| 4. Budget | Instructor fee — the amount from the quote calculator (excl. VAT) Separate items — materials, travel, venue, and meals KRW [ ] |
| 5. Expected benefits |
|
| 6. Measuring results |
|
| 7. Attachments | ROI calculator · Likely questions and answers |
② ROI Worksheet
Benefit B = participants × weekly hours saved per person × hourly labor cost × 48 weeks per year × actual adoption rate
| Feature | Example values | Basis / values to replace |
|---|---|---|
| Participants | 20 people | Confirmed number of trainees |
| Hours saved per person per week | 1 hour | Measure work hours before and after training, then replace with actuals |
| Hourly labor cost | KRW 30,000 (≈ US$22) | Average annual salary ÷ annual working hours (about 2,080 hours) |
| Actual adoption rate | 50% | Share of trainees who actually keep using it — a conservative estimate |
Example benefit B — 20 people × 1 hour × KRW 30,000 (≈ US$22) × 48 weeks × 50% = KRW 14.4 million (≈ US$10,800) per year
Ask each participant to note how long a task usually takes and how long it took in the hands-on session on training day. The difference is your measured time saved.
③ Draft answers to 10 questions executives are likely to ask
Can’t people just learn on their own from YouTube or free courses?
Employees already use it. Do we still need training?
Who is accountable if there is a security incident?
Can you show the results in numbers?
Isn’t one session enough?
Why do this now?
Does every employee need to attend?
Do we need to buy paid accounts too?
Can’t our in-house IT person just teach it?
Isn’t taking time away from work a net loss?
🧭 Leadership training for team leads — approval request, ROI, likely questions
① One-page approval request
| 1. Purpose | To have team leaders run one-on-ones, task allocation, and feedback to the same standard, reducing variation in team performance and employee turnover. |
|---|---|
| 2. Background |
|
| 3. Training overview | Audience[ ] new team leaders + [ ] current team leadersHours and format[4]-hour interactive on-site workshop (case discussion and role-play)Preferred scheduleMonth [ ], week [ ] — for new team leaders, we recommend within 90 days of appointmentProviderNanum Consulting (nanumcon.com)Main contentMoving into the team leader role → How to run 1:1 meetings → Assigning work and delegating → Feedback conversation practice → Writing a team operations action plan |
| 4. Budget | Instructor fee — the amount from the quote calculator (excl. VAT) Separate items — materials, travel, venue, and meals KRW [ ] |
| 5. Expected benefits |
|
| 6. Measuring results |
|
| 7. Attachments | ROI calculator · Likely questions and answers |
② ROI Worksheet
Benefit B = number of participating team leaders × annual reduction in departures per team × replacement cost per person
| Feature | Example values | Basis / values to replace |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participating team leads | 10 people | Confirmed number of trainees |
| Fewer departures per team per year | 0.2 people | About one fewer departure in one of every five teams — a conservative estimate |
| Replacement cost per person | KRW 20 million (≈ US$15,000) | Recruiting cost plus the gap until the replacement is fully productive — replace with your HR team’s baseline |
Example benefit B — 10 people × 0.2 people × KRW 20 million (≈ US$15,000) = KRW 40 million (≈ US$29,900) per year
Reduced turnover takes time to show. For the approval stage, we suggest also listing the number of one-on-one meetings held, which you can see within 3 months, as a leading indicator.
③ Draft answers to 10 questions executives are likely to ask
Don’t team leads learn by doing?
We made a strong performer a team leader, so why more training?
Can one training session really change people?
How do we confirm the results?
Is it worth the cost?
Can’t an experienced in-house team leader mentor them?
Isn’t it enough to train only new team leaders?
When is the best time to run it?
Can’t online courses replace this?
What happens after the training?
📈 Sales Skills Training — Approval Memo · ROI · Likely Questions
① One-page approval request
| 1. Purpose | Have sales reps manage every stage from prospecting to proposal and close the same way, reducing individual variance in sales performance and raising the win rate. |
|---|---|
| 2. Background |
|
| 3. Training overview | Participants[ ] sales reps + [ ] sales managersHours and format[4]-hour on-site hands-on workshop (run with your own sales cases)Preferred scheduleMonth [ ], week [ ] — recommended for the start-of-year sales kickoff or before the second half beginsProviderNanum Consulting (nanumcon.com) — delivered directly by our CEO, who has 10 years of B2B overseas sales experience in semiconductorsKey contentDefining sales stages and checkpoint questions for each stage → value propositions built around customer problems → structuring proposals and presentations → writing a next-action plan for one of your own live deals |
| 4. Budget | Instructor fee — the amount from the quote calculator (excl. VAT) Separate items — materials, travel, venue, and meals KRW [ ] |
| 5. Expected benefits |
|
| 6. Measuring results |
|
| 7. Attachments | ROI calculator · Likely questions and answers |
② ROI Worksheet
Benefit B = participants × annual sales per person × sales improvement rate × contribution margin
| Feature | Example values | Basis / values to replace |
|---|---|---|
| Participants | 10 people | Confirmed number of trainees |
| Annual revenue per person | KRW 1 billion (≈ US$748,200) | Average for sales reps over the past year |
| Sales improvement rate | 1% | Even a small rise in win rate is enough — a conservative estimate |
| Contribution margin | 20% | Calculate it as profit, not revenue, or approvers won’t accept it — replace with your finance team’s figures |
Example benefit B — 10 people × KRW 1 billion (≈ US$748,200) × 1% × 20% = KRW 20 million (≈ US$15,000) per year
Calculating in terms of revenue makes the figures look large and invites suspicion. A smaller figure based on profit gets through approval faster.
③ Draft answers to 10 questions executives are likely to ask
Isn’t sales something you learn through experience?
Can you guarantee that training will increase sales?
Does an outside instructor who doesn’t know our industry actually help?
How will we measure the impact?
Is it worth the cost?
Do experienced veterans need to attend too?
Won’t taking time away from selling hurt results?
Can a single training session make a difference?
Won’t our customer data leak into the training materials?
Do sales managers need to attend too?
How to fill it in
- Pick a topicOpen the memo closest to the training you want to propose. Even if your training isn’t one of the three topics, you can still use the memo template and the ROI method as they are.
- Fill in the blanksFill in the audience, headcount, and schedule marked with [ ], and delete or edit any of the three background lines that don’t fit your company. The background is strongest when you write it as “what is already happening.”
- Change the ROI assumptionsReplace the example numbers with your company’s HR and finance figures. For training cost C, enter the quote calculator amount as is.
- Answer likely questions in advancePick three or four of the ten questions an approver is likely to ask and answer them in the 'Review comments' section at the bottom of the draft. This reduces rejections.
Get your PDF with estimated fee
We send the approval memo, ROI worksheet, and 10 likely questions for your chosen topic as a single PDF. The estimated instructor fee for your format and headcount is already filled into the memo’s budget line and the ROI sheet’s training cost, so you can submit it for approval as is. We don’t ask for a phone number — just your name and email.
If you get stuck before approval
If an approver asks a question not in the kit, or you need a draft for a different topic, let us know. We will send a draft answer and a quote within 24 hours.
FAQ
Is the kit free?
Can we use the kit without training with Nanum Consulting?
Is there training other than these three topics?
Are the numbers in the ROI sheet based on evidence?
How can I confirm the training cost to put in the approval document?
Related pages
※ The figures in the ROI worksheet are example assumptions that show how the calculation works. Before you submit for approval, replace them with your company’s HR and finance baselines. Instructor fees exclude VAT; materials and travel costs are separate line items.