🧭 Serious Accidents Punishment Act: Management Officer Course
What courts dispute in Serious Accidents Punishment Act trials is not the accident itself. It is whether the company had a safety and health management system in place before the accident, and whether it actually ran it. That is why the evidence submitted in court is not the accident report but the paper trail built up over time: semiannual inspection records, budget execution details, and evaluation results.
This course is not a reading of the statute. We turn the nine measures set out in the Enforcement Decree into what to do, when, who does it, and where it is recorded, and you fill in a single table with your company’s current status. You leave with a form you can use as-is for your semiannual review.
Why this training
- Indictment takes 18 months on average, and the evidence is already fixedDocuments created after an accident are often used against you. Checking what is missing now is the whole point of this training.
- Delegating does not transfer responsibilityEven if you appoint an executive for safety and health, the CEO remains the management officer as long as the authority to represent and oversee the business stays with the CEO. In both the first ruling and the first prison sentence, the defendant was the CEO.
- Principal contractors are punished for subcontractor accidentsThe first verdict under the Serious Accidents Punishment Act was a guilty verdict against a principal contractor’s CEO, and the first prison sentence involved the death of a subcontractor’s worker. Failing to set standards for contracting, outsourcing, and delegation is itself a violation.
- Neglecting training is itself a violationArticle 5 of the Enforcement Decree places a direct duty on the management officer to check at least once every half year that safety and health training has been carried out. A worksite that skips the 16 annual hours for supervisors faces both a fine under the Occupational Safety and Health Act and a violation of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act.
Curriculum
This is the standard 2-hour (120-minute) format. Extending to a 4-hour half-day adds 120 minutes of industry-specific case studies and discussion to “Turning the nine measures into a checklist” and “What the rulings actually weighed.”
What you take away
The training ends in two hours, but the semiannual inspections go on. That is why we provide the templates too.
- Management officer compliance checklist — nine measures × owner, frequency, and where the evidence is kept
- Semiannual review form — a single page covering only the items in Articles 4 and 5 of the Enforcement Decree that require review every six months
- Checklist for training required under safety and health laws — including the status of statutory training completion, such as 16 hours per year for supervisors
- Training log and attendee sign-in form (for records)
Common points of confusion
If we appoint a safety and health executive, is the CEO off the hook? — No ruling has settled it that way yet. The Act defines the responsible executive as “the person who represents the business and holds the authority and responsibility to oversee it,” or “a person in an equivalent role who handles safety and health matters.” Prosecutors look at who actually held the authority. What matters is not the title but the approval chain and budget authority.
Does ISO 45001 exempt us? — No. However, the documents and internal audit records of a certified system can serve as evidence for a good part of the nine measures. Finding the overlap and reusing it is the realistic place to start.
Isn’t there still a grace period for workplaces under 50 workers? — The grace period ended on January 26, 2024. Since January 27, 2024, the Act applies to any workplace with 5 or more regular workers regardless of size, and in construction it also covers projects under KRW 5 billion (≈ US$3,740,800). Of the 605 workplace fatalities in 2025, 351 occurred at workplaces with fewer than 50 workers.
Is this training eligible for Employment Insurance reimbursement? — No. To receive reimbursement, the course must be delivered as commissioned training under a program approved by the Ministry of Employment and Labor. Nanum Consulting does not hold that program approval, so on-site training is not eligible. If reimbursement is a condition for budget approval, please tell us when you first contact us.
Construction and manufacturing — what changes by industry
Tell us your industry and we will tailor the curriculum to the cases below.
🏗️ Construction — what’s different
Of the 605 workplace fatalities subject to accident investigation in 2025, 286 (47%) were in construction, up 10 from the previous year. The first ruling under the Serious Accidents Punishment Act also involved a construction site.
| Scope of application | For projects of KRW 5 billion (≈ US$3,740,800) or more, the Act has applied since 27 Jan 2022; for projects under KRW 5 (≈ US$1) billion, since 27 Jan 2024. It now applies to any workplace with 5 or more regular employees, regardless of project value. |
|---|---|
| Dedicated unit | Construction companies ranked in the top 200 by construction capacity must have a dedicated organization that oversees safety and health. |
| The weakest link | These are the standards for contracting, outsourced services, and delegation. You must set standards and procedures for assessing a contractor’s ability to prevent industrial accidents, along with standards for safety and health costs and construction schedules, and check them at least twice a year. A record showing that contractors were chosen on lowest price alone will count as evidence against you. |
| Supervisors | Designate one per site. Naming a single person at headquarters does not meet the requirement. |
| Accident types | Falls, collapses, and collisions are the main types, and in 2025 these types increased from the previous year. |
In May 2022, a subcontractor’s worker fell and died at a nursing-hospital extension site in Goyang. The court found that the required measures under the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Rules, such as fall-protection harness anchor points and a written work plan, had not been taken, and that the principal contractor had not properly met its duty to build and operate a safety and health management system.
The prime contractor’s CEO received a 1-year-6-month prison sentence suspended for 3 years, the company a KRW 30 million (≈ US$22,400) fine, and the site manager a KRW 5 million (≈ US$3,740) fine. Neither the prosecution nor the defendants appealed, so the ruling became final.
The apology and condolence payment to the bereaved family, and the fact that the family did not seek punishment, were reflected in the sentence. It also means that without those circumstances, a prison sentence was possible.
- At a site the principal contractor effectively controls, operates, or manages, an accident involving a subcontractor’s worker is also the responsibility of the principal contractor’s executive.
- Simply having a site manager and a safety manager is not considered a functioning system. What matters is whether they were actually given authority and budget.
- Missing individual measures required by regulation, such as work plans and safety harness anchor equipment, are used as evidence of an inadequate system.
🏭 Manufacturing — what’s different
In 2025, manufacturing accident deaths fell by 17 to 158 (150 cases). They are declining, but still account for a quarter of all deaths, and the first prison sentence and the first ruling finalized by the Supreme Court under the Serious Accidents Punishment Act both came from manufacturing sites.
| Scope of application | The Act applies to workplaces with 5 or more regular employees. The grace period for workplaces with fewer than 50 employees ended on 26 Jan 2024. |
|---|---|
| Dedicated unit | Companies with 500 or more regular employees must have a dedicated organization overseeing safety and health. |
| The weakest link | These are non-routine tasks such as equipment repair, cleaning and maintenance. A risk assessment that covers only routine work misses the tasks where accidents actually happen. |
| Occupational diseases | If three or more workers develop occupational illnesses such as acute poisoning from the same hazard within one year, it counts as a serious industrial accident even with no deaths. Workplaces that handle chemicals should check this provision separately. |
| Accident types | Caught-in and struck-by accidents are the main types. Both declined from the previous year in 2025. |
In March 2022, at Korea Steel in Haman, South Gyeongsang, a subcontractor’s worker died when a heat-dissipation plate weighing about 1.2 tons fell during equipment repair work. The court of first instance sentenced the CEO to one year in prison and took him into custody in the courtroom.
CEO sentenced to 1 year in prison (final), corporate fine of KRW 100 million (≈ US$74,800). This is the first prison sentence since the Act took effect, and the first one upheld by the Supreme Court.
The main reason given for the prison sentence was a record of repeated punishment for violating the Occupational Safety and Health Act. The Supreme Court held that the offense of causing death under the Serious Accidents Punishment Act, the Occupational Safety and Health Act offense arising from the worker’s death, and professional negligence resulting in death are in a relationship of ideal concurrence.
- A past record of Occupational Safety and Health Act violations weighs heavily at sentencing. Organizing your corrective-order and fine history is where preparation starts.
- First check whether non-routine work such as equipment repair and maintenance, and work done by contractors, is included in your risk assessment.
- Even with no deaths, three workers with occupational illnesses such as acute poisoning within one year make it a serious industrial accident.
When Nanum Consulting delivers it
The 2-hour lecture is our standard. Executives rarely have long blocks of time together. Most often, we schedule it just before or after a board or management meeting.
We do not read the statute aloud. Half the session is spent filling in the checklist with your own company’s current status, and you leave with a form you can use as-is for your semiannual review.
This course covers safety and health laws and court rulings, so we assign instructors who meet the instructor qualifications set by the safety and health training regulations. Tell us your industry (construction, manufacturing) and workplace structure in advance, and we will tailor the course to cases from your industry.
Add the Supervisor Course on the same day to finish 2 hours for executives plus 4 hours for on-site supervisors in a single day. Supervisor hours count toward the statutory 16 hours per year.
On-Site Training · Get a Quote
Tell us the training hours, headcount, and industry, and we will send a schedule proposal and quote within 24 hours.
Published rates: KRW 1.2 million (≈ US$900) for lectures of 2 hours or less · KRW 600,000 (≈ US$450) per hour for 3–4-hour half-day sessions · KRW 500,000 (≈ US$375) per hour for 6–8-hour full-day sessions. VAT, materials, and travel are extra. If sessions are split by shift or site, the price is multiplied by the number of sessions.
Management Officer Course — FAQ
Does the Serious Accidents Punishment Act require responsible executives to receive training?
Is the responsible executive the CEO or the executive in charge of safety and health?
Is a principal contractor also responsible for accidents involving subcontractors’ workers?
Does the Act apply to workplaces with fewer than 50 workers now?
How long is the training, and what does it cost?
See also
Legal basis · Sources
- Act on the Punishment of Serious Accidents, etc. (Korea Law Information Center)
- Enforcement Decree of the Serious Accidents Punishment Act (Korea Law Information Center)
- Enforcement Rule of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, Table 4 — Safety and Health Training Hours by Course
- Ministry of Employment and Labor, “2025 (Cumulative) Industrial Accident Statistics — Fatal Accidents Subject to Investigation,” preliminary results (31 Mar 2026)
- Ministry of Employment and Labor, “Commentary on the Serious Accidents Punishment Act — Serious Industrial Accidents”
- Supreme Court, Dec. 28, 2023, Case No. 2023Do12316 (Korea Steel case)
This page provides general information to help you understand the Serious Accidents Punishment Act and the Occupational Safety and Health Act. It is not legal advice. Applicability, scope of obligations, and penalty levels depend on a workplace’s size, industry, and contract structure, on amendments to the law, and on the facts of each case. For specific matters, please consult an attorney, a certified labor attorney, or the local employment and labor office. Cited rulings summarize press reports and publicly released case materials and may differ from the full text of the judgment. .